|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 36 post(s) |
Normin Bates
   |
Posted - 2009.11.06 23:35:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Kalissa
The bigger alliances will be crying buckets over those sov changes.
Nice! 
Yea. All the rich & lazy alliances are being thrust out of their comfort zone. Hence the buckets of tears.
Gee...they will have to think/work a bit more and not hold multiple regions. Sucks to be a bloated alliance with piles of empty systems right now huh? |
Normin Bates
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 05:49:00 -
[2]
More bloated Alliance tears! Keep 'em coming! 
Please CCP....Don't let the tears from these Alliances with hundreds of unused systems sway your objective. Let them see what they can make of it and then adjust...if needed. If they rage-quit then so be it.
Wahhhhh, we can't keep our 57 systems that we never use! Too funny! 
|
Normin Bates
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 16:30:00 -
[3]
So many tears from the large Alliances that control huge areas of empty/unused space.
Claim less systems. Problem solved.
------------------------------------
I would like to know what will happen to the Drone regions though. Without bounty rats they will be abandoned wastelands with no activity or SOV. CCP?
|
Normin Bates
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 19:30:00 -
[4]
Geez.
I hope CCP doesn't buckle under the pressure of the tears and whines on here. Implement as intended and adjust later FFS. |
Normin Bates
|
Posted - 2009.11.08 19:23:00 -
[5]
CCP please move forward with this expansion. Pay no attention to the large alliance tears posted here. They're only afraid of change and unwilling to adapt. Adjust later with a "mini-expansion" if needed.
If the Alliances can't handle it they'll go back to empire space. (buh- bye!) Those who CAN handle it will adjust & adapt to whatever conditions apply to 0.0 They won't feel a need to have giant areas of empty systems and will use Dominion to their advantage.
It's laughable how they keep saying that it will ruin 0.0 for everyone,,,even the smaller alliances looking to move into 0.0 Funny how they are all of a sudden concerned about smaller alliances and their ability to hold space.
P.S. - Mad Props to Tri and PL for not whining and sheding buckets of tears over Dominion.
|
Normin Bates
|
Posted - 2009.11.09 20:35:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Pointfive
Originally by: Tesal
Originally by: Nobani
Edited by: Nobani on 09/11/2009 19:47:10
Originally by: Treji
I, and many other players, don't think 0.0 space income can possibly be compared to 0.0 space expected income. The two are completely different animals. If its about personal isk income, then you shouldn't be in 0.0 in the first place...especially if you depended on allainces to supply ships etc, and now are faced with the fat provider cow being slaughtered...
So you're 0.0 players should trade flying good ships for the e-honour of having a dot on the map?
No, you should die, and I should laugh.
Sov map says it all. Look it over. compare it with population and how much the systems are used. Its easy to see who can, and who cannot adjust easily.
You seem to be under the delusion that corps will be trying to move to nullsec space and will have a chance against any large alliance.
That's the problem with large Alliances right now. You claim huge areas of space that never get used or are empty just for the sake of claiming it. If a smaller group tries to move in you squash them just because you can...while ignoring any diplomatic efforts.
If they're smaller what threat are they? NO threat at all, yet instead of working with them and having a relationship other than renters you immediately go in and kill them with 100 man cap fleets.
Maybe you're upset that having renters won't be so viable anymore?
With Dominion you'll prob operate the same way: Squash anyone that comes near yet leave the space unclaimed. So much for small gang PvP huh?
Face it. You're afraid of change. You're afraid to adapt. You want to control huge areas of unused space just because you can.
Boil it down and you've asked for Dominion exactly as it is in the Dev blog...you're just to daft with tunnel vision to realize it. |
Normin Bates
|
Posted - 2009.11.10 21:16:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Cefte
[x] Ignorant of value of own time.
[x] No understanding of term 'opportunity cost'
[ ] Pathologically risk averse.
Two out of three for the empire pubbie trifecta.
[x] Patently lazy and tear soaked goon.
[x] Unwilling to adapt.
[x] Fears losing vast areas of unused space.
[ ] Now seriously concerned about smaller alliances' ability to hold space.
[x] Hopes CCP will buckle under the tears posted here.
[ ] Is honest & genuine.
Fixed that for ya.
|
|
|
| |
|